Crypto casino market share report: October 2026 edition
Who took the money in crypto gambling last month, measured by on-chain deposits rather than press releases. This edition covers the 30 days to 2 October 2026 for every casino Tanzanite tracks, with the full table as a free CSV.
Headline numbers
All figures cover the 30 days to 2 October 2026. "Previous 30 days" means the comparison window Tanzanite reports in the same data pull.
Money in rose while the number of deposits fell. Tracked deposit volume grew 13.9% to $4.95B, but players made 3.2% fewer deposits (7,491,962 against 7,735,994). The gap is explained by larger tickets: the average deposit across all 41 casinos climbed from $562 to $661. Of the $606M net increase, three casinos supplied 73%: BC.Game, Stake and Duel. 24 casinos grew and 17 shrank.
Top 10 by deposit volume and share of total
Ranked exactly in Tanzanite's order. Share is each casino's deposits divided by the $4.95B total for all 41 tracked casinos. "Rank before" is the casino's position in the previous 30 days, from the same pull.
Chart: share of tracked deposits, top 10. The table below gives the same data with dollar values.
| # | Casino | Deposits, 30 days | Share | vs prev 30 days | Rank before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stake | $2.27B | 45.9% | +7.0% | 1 (same) |
| 2 | Roobet | $443M | 8.9% | -2.3% | 2 (same) |
| 3 | Duel | $392M | 7.9% | +55.8% | 4 (up 1) |
| 4 | Rainbet | $320M | 6.5% | +9.0% | 3 (down 1) |
| 5 | BC.Game | $317M | 6.4% | +93.2% | 7 (up 2) |
| 6 | Gamdom | $240M | 4.8% | +29.4% | 6 (same) |
| 7 | Shuffle | $207M | 4.2% | +3.0% | 5 (down 2) |
| 8 | 1WIN | $143M | 2.9% | +25.2% | 8 (same) |
| 9 | Stake.us US sweepstakes site, not real-money | $92.8M | 1.9% | -13.4% | 9 (same) |
| 10 | Sportsbet.io | $76.0M | 1.5% | +12.9% | 10 (same) |
| Top 10 combined | $4.50B | 90.9% | |||
| Ranks 11 to 41 (31 casinos) | $453M | 9.1% | |||
| All 41 tracked casinos | $4.95B | 100% | +13.9% |
Two places changed hands inside the top five. Duel moved up to #3 ($392M, +55.8%) and pushed Rainbet down to #4 ($320M), and BC.Game jumped from #7 to #5 after nearly doubling its intake. Shuffle slipped from #5 to #7 despite growing 3.0%. Stake.us, which sells sweepstakes coins in the US rather than taking real-money bets, is ranked #9 because Tanzanite tracks it alongside the others; read its row with that in mind.
How concentrated is the market?
Shares of the $4.95B tracked total, compared with the same measure for the previous 30 days.
One operator still takes close to half of every tracked dollar, but that share eased by 3.0 points. Stake's volume grew 7.0%, slower than the rest of the field: excluding Stake, the other 40 casinos grew 20.6% together. The bottom of the table is thin. The 31 casinos ranked 11 to 41 add up to 9.1% of deposits, only 24 casinos took $10M or more, and 8 took $100M or more.
For readers who use a formal measure: the Herfindahl-Hirschman index for the 41 tracked casinos is about 2,388. The US 2023 Merger Guidelines treat a market above 1,800 as highly concentrated. Treat this as indicative only, because the tracked set is not the whole crypto gambling market.
Biggest movers
Percentage change in deposits against the previous 30 days, limited to casinos with at least $10M in either window so that tiny bases do not dominate.
Largest gains
Largest declines
- Rollbit (#40): $13.1M to $1,037, -99.99% (possible tracking gap, see note below)
- Dicey (#22): $19.3M to $15.6M, -19.2%
- MetaWin (#21): $23.1M to $19.6M, -15.4%
- Stake.us (#9): $107M to $92.8M, -13.4%
- 500 Casino (#20): $23.1M to $20.6M, -10.7%
In dollar terms the largest gain was BC.Game's $153M, followed by Stake ($149M) and Duel ($140M). The largest dollar decline belonged to Stake.us ($14.4M lower), ahead of Rollbit's apparent drop and Roobet ($10.2M lower).
Average deposit size leaders
Deposit volume divided by deposit count. Limited to casinos that took at least $10M, because a handful of transfers can make a small casino's average meaningless.
| Casino | Average deposit | Deposits | Volume rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Casinobet | $14.6K | 2,015 | #17 |
| Gamba | $9,160 | 1,686 | #23 |
| Sportsbet.io | $5,546 | 13,700 | #10 |
| Cloudbet | $3,718 | 11,083 | #14 |
| BC.Game | $2,575 | 123,230 | #5 |
| Duel | $1,590 | 246,413 | #3 |
Casinobet and Gamba stand out: they rank only #17 and #23 by volume, yet each averaged more than $9,000 per deposit from fewer than 2,100 transfers, which points to a small number of large depositors. Sportsbet.io and Cloudbet also run high averages. At the other end, SolCasino ($247), Rainbet ($297) and 1WIN ($301) had the smallest averages among casinos above $10M, consistent with many small deposits. Stake averaged $734.
Ranked by number of deposits
Counting transfers instead of dollars gives a different order, closer to a measure of how many times players fund their accounts.
| # | Casino | Deposits, 30 days | Share of count | Volume rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stake | 3,094,936 | 41.3% | #1 |
| 2 | Rainbet | 1,078,978 | 14.4% | #4 |
| 3 | Roobet | 701,838 | 9.4% | #2 |
| 4 | Shuffle | 553,886 | 7.4% | #7 |
| 5 | 1WIN | 474,556 | 6.3% | #8 |
Rainbet is fourth by dollars but second by count, with 1,078,978 deposits. Stake made 3,094,936 deposits, 9.3% fewer than in the previous 30 days, even as its dollar volume rose. Duel, third by dollars, is sixth by count.
Methodology and source
What this data is
- Source: Tanzanite centralized deposit volume, "Month" view, pulled 2 October 2026 for all 41 casinos it tracks. All credit for the underlying data belongs to Tanzanite; ProvenlyFair.com ranked, summed and derived the shares, averages and changes.
- Measure: the USD value and number of crypto deposits sent on-chain to wallet addresses Tanzanite attributes to each casino, over a rolling window of about 30 days ending 2 October 2026.
- Comparison: every change figure uses the previous-30-days values Tanzanite reports in the same pull. We did not compare against our earlier editions, because consecutive rolling windows overlap and would double-count days.
- Derived figures: share = casino deposits / $4.95B total; average deposit = volume / count; rank before = order by previous-30-days volume.
What it is not
- Not gross gaming revenue, profit or wagering turnover. A deposit is money in; some of it is withdrawn later.
- Not the whole market. Card, bank and fiat payments are invisible to on-chain tracking, as are deposits to wallets Tanzanite has not identified and casinos outside its 41.
- Not split by country. The figures are global; nothing here shows where players are located or where a casino is legally available.
For the annual revenue picture and why the widely repeated $81.4B figure is too high, see our crypto gambling market size page. The always-current order lives on the deposit leaderboards.
How to cite this report
Suggested citation
You may quote any figure with attribution to ProvenlyFair.com and Tanzanite. Always include the data window.
ProvenlyFair.com (2026). Crypto casino market share report: October 2026 edition. Data: Tanzanite on-chain deposit volume, 30 days to 2 October 2026. https://provenlyfair.com/crypto-gambling-market-size/2026-10/
Short form for social posts or captions: "Source: ProvenlyFair.com, Tanzanite data, 30 days to 2 Oct 2026."
Download the data
The CSV lists all 41 casinos with rank, Tanzanite site ID, 30-day deposits in USD, deposit count, average deposit, previous-30-days deposits, percentage change, share of total and previous rank. The window (30 days to 2 October 2026) is in the column names and the source is named on every row. Figures are unrounded, so they will differ slightly from the rounded numbers on this page.